PeterMac:
I have read the book three times
Brutally chopped it into three chunks in an attempt to overcome it
Annotated it, copied it, quoted from it, argued over it
Lain awake at night struggling to find the fatal flaw in the logic
But eventually decided that because of its length it needs serious editing.
A Précis in fact.
So after another sleepless night and several hours at the keyboard this morning,
Here it is.
SHE DIED
THEY LIED
********
Hope that helps
THEY LIED
********
Hope that helps
to insert even a reasonable doubt into either statement.
and remember that the defence has no witnesses.
There is no one who can supply a contrary scenario, no one who has ever, even after 17 years been able to explain how IT could have been done.
Not anyone,
Not Mendax Maximus Mitchell, nor Inventive Journalist Clarke-Kent.
Every important aspect of their original story was destroyed within hours,
much of it in the clear sight of those watching the TV news that morning, (though not, strangely, of Clarke who was there)
And the second story was destroyed shortly after its invention, as were subsequent iterations.
The book does two things. It lists and details their lies,
AND then goes further, in part 3 to detail an impressive single handed CROP operation,
which produces unexpected results
https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t17551-norwegian-ex-military-detective-claims-to-have-solved-madeleine-case